Clarkson Faculty Review / Submission - To Complete Review
1. View files in folders located in the sections named: Candidate Submissions, File Preparer Submissions.
2. Submit a letter of review at the "Clarkson Faculty Reviewer Submissions" assignment activity (.pdf only). See below for requirements from Operations Manual.
Operations Manual
OM5.5.0 Evaluation Procedures for Tenure - The Tenure Policy
B. Tenure Review Procedures, 3.2 1-3
2. Procedures for Internal Evaluations
- The preparer will solicit evaluations regarding the candidate's suitability for tenure from all tenured faculty members in the department (or relevant organization), from non-tenured faculty members in the department (or relevant organization), and from faculty members outside the department who are thought to have special knowledge of the candidate. All tenured faculty members within the department must provide an evaluation of the candidate, or submit a written statement that they choose not to do so.
- The preparer will make available to faculty preparing internal evaluations: the candidate's complete resume or curriculum vitae, copies of the candidate's scholarly works, any information documenting teaching and advising performance (e.g. student evaluation of teaching scores, classroom visit reports) offered for review by the candidate, documentation of service accomplishments, as well as any other materials the candidate wishes to have considered (including such other items from the personnel file as the annual evaluation reports). If the candidate elects to offer the student evaluation of teaching scores for review by faculty colleagues, the preparer shall append the "appropriate comparison data" (referenced in item 5.5.A.11.e of the definition of the tenure file) to these scores.
- Faculty preparing evaluations should review and analyze the materials provided for assessment: their assessments should gauge the candidate=s qualifications and performance with care, and should do so in light of the evaluation standards described in 5.3. Where possible, evaluators should buttress their comments with first hand observations.